VIRGINIA DCR STORMWATER PERMEABLE PAVEMENTVERSION 1.6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION Permeable pavements are alternative paving surfaces that allow stormwater runoff to filter through voids in the pavement surface into an underlying stone reservoir where it is temporarily stored and/or infiltrated. A variety of permeable pavement surfaces are available including pervious concrete, porous asphalt and permeable interlocking concrete pavers. While the specific design may vary, all permeable pavements have a similar structure, consisting of a surface pavement layer, an underlying stone aggregate reservoir layer and a filter layer or fabric installed on the bottom (See Figure 1). The thickness of the reservoir layer is determined by both a structural and hydrologic design analysis. The reservoir layer serves to retain stormwater and also supports the design traffic loads for the pavement. In low infiltration soils, some or all of the filtered runoff is collected in an underdrain and returned to the storm drain system. If infiltration rates in native soils permit, permeable pavement can be designed without an underdrain to enable full infiltration of runoff. A combination of these methods can be used to infiltrate a portion of the filtered runoff. Permeable pavement is typically designed to treat stormwater that falls on the actual pavement surface area, but may also be used to accept run-on from small adjacent impervious areas, such as impermeable driving lanes or rooftops. However, careful sediment control is needed for any run-on areas to avoid clogging of the down-gradient permeable pavement. Permeable pavement has been used at commercial, institutional, and residential sites in spaces that are traditionally impervious. Permeable pavement promotes a high degree of runoff reduction and nutrient removal, and can also reduce the effective impervious cover of a development site. Cross Section of Typical Permeable Pavement (Hunt & Collins, 2008) The overall stormwater functions of permeable pavement are shown in Table 1.
The choice of what kind of permeable pavement to use is influenced by site-specific design factors and the intended future use of the permeable surface. A general comparison of the engineering properties of the three major permeable pavement types is provided in Table 2, although designers should check with product vendors and their local review authority to determine their specific requirements and capabilities. Designers should also note that there are other paver options, such as concrete grid pavers, and reinforced turf pavers that function in the same general manner as permeable pavement.
SECTION 2: LEVEL 1 AND 2 DESIGN TABLE The major design goal of Permeable Pavement is to maximize nutrient removal and runoff reduction. To this end, designers may choose to utilize a baseline permeable pavement design (Level 1) or choose an enhanced Level 2 that maximizes nutrient and runoff reduction. To qualify for Level 2, the design must meet all design criteria shown in the right hand column of Table 3.
SECTION 3: TYPICAL DETAILS Typical Detail (Smith, 2009) SECTION 4: PHYSICAL FEASIBILITY AND DESIGN APPLICATIONS Since permeable pavement has a very high runoff reduction capability, it should always be considered as an alternative to conventional pavement. Permeable pavement is subject to the same feasibility constraints as most infiltration practices, as described below:
If the proposed permeable pavement area is designed to infiltrate runoff without underdrains, it must have a minimum infiltration rate of 0.5 inches per hour. Initially, projected soil infiltration rates can be estimated from NRCS soil data, but they must be confirmed by an on-site infiltration measurement. Native soils must have silt/clay content less than 40% and clay content less than 20%. Designers should also evaluate existing soil properties during initial site layout, and seek to configure the site to conserve and protect the soils with the greatest recharge and infiltration rates. In particular, areas of Hydrologic Soil Group A or B soils shown on NRCS soil surveys should be considered as primary locations for all types of infiltration.
Table 4 outlines the different design requirements for each of the three scales of permeable pavement installation.
Regardless of the design scale of the Permeable Pavement, the designer should carefully consider the expected traffic load at the proposed site and the consequent structural requirements of the pavement system. Sites with heavy traffic loads will require a thick aggregate base, and in the case of porous asphalt and pervious concrete, may require the addition of an admixture for strength, or a specific bedding design. In contrast, most micro-scale applications should have little or no traffic to contend with. SECTION 5: DESIGN CRITERIA 5.1. Sizing of Permeable Pavement Structural Design If permeable pavement will be used in a parking lot or other setting that involves vehicles, the pavement surface must be able to support the maximum traffic load. The structural design process will vary according to the type of pavement selected, and the manufacturer’s specific recommendations should be consulted. The thickness of the permeable pavement and reservoir layer must be sized to support structural loads and to temporarily store the design storm volume (e.g., water quality, channel protection, and/or flood control volume). On most development and redevelopment sites, the structural support requirements will dictate the depth of the underlying stone reservoir. The structural design of permeable pavements considers four main site elements:
The resulting structural requirements may include, but are not limited to, the thickness of the pavement, filter, and reservoir layer. It should be noted that if the underlying soils have a low California Bearing Ratio (CBR) (less than 4%), they may need to be compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density, which generally rules out their use for infiltration. Designers should determine structural design requirements by consulting transportation design guidance such as:
Hydraulic Design Permeable pavement is typically sized to store the water quality volume or other design storm in the reservoir layer. The infiltration rate typically will be less than the flow rate through the pavement, so that some underground reservoir storage will usually be required. Designers should initially assume that there is no outflow through underdrains, and use Equation 1 to determine the depth of the reservoir layer, assuming runoff fully infiltrates into the underlying soil: where: The maximum allowable depth of the reservoir layer is constrained by the maximum allowable drain time, which is calculated using Equation 2. (2) The following design assumptions apply to Equations 1 and 2:
If the depth of the reservoir layer is too great (i.e. dp exceeds dp-max), or the verified soil infiltration rate is less than 0.5 inches per hour, then the design method typically changes to account for underdrains. The storage volume in the pavements must account for the underlying infiltration rate and outflow through the underdrain. In this case, the design storm should be routed through the pavement to accurately determine the required reservoir depth. Or the designer may use Equations 3 through 5 to approximate the depth of the reservoir layer for designs using underdrains. Equation 3 can be used to approximate the outflow rate from the underdrain. The hydraulic conductivity, k, of gravel media is very high (~17,000 ft/day); however, the permeable pavement reservoir layer will drain increasingly slower as the storage volume decreases (i.e. hydraulic head decreases). To account for this change, a conservative permeability coefficient of 100 ft/day can be used to approximate the average underdrain outflow rate. where: Once the outflow rate through the underdrain has been approximated, Equation 4 is used to determine the depth of the reservoir layer needed to store the design storm. where: The maximum allowable depth of the reservoir layer is constrained by the maximum allowable drain time, which is calculated using Equation 5. where: If the depth of the reservoir layer is still too great (i.e. dp exceeds dp-max), the number of underdrains can be increased, which will increase the underdrain outflow rate. Permeable pavement can also be designed to address, in whole or in part, the detention storage needed for channel protection and/or flood control. The designer can model various approaches by factoring in storage within the stone aggregate layer, expected infiltration and any outlet structures used as part of the design. Routing can also be used to provide a more accurate solution of the peak discharge and required storage volume. Once runoff passes the surface of the pervious pavement system, designers should calculate outflow pathways to handle subsurface flows. Subsurface flows can be regulated using underdrains, volume of storage in the reservoir layer, and the bed slope of the reservoir layer, and/or a control structure at the outlet. 5.2. Soil Infiltration Rate Testing The measured infiltration rate of subsoils must be 0.5 inch per hour or greater to design without an underdrain. On-site soil infiltration rate testing procedures are outlined in Appendix A of the Infiltration Design Specification (No. 8). A minimum of one test shall be taken per 1,000 sq. ft. of planned permeable pavement surface area. In most cases, a single soil test is sufficient for micro-scale and small-scale applications. At least one soil boring must be taken to confirm the underlying soil properties at the depth where infiltration is designed to occur (i.e., to ensure that the depth to water table, depth to bedrock or active karst is defined). Soil infiltration testing should be conducted within any confining layers that are found within 4 feet of the bottom of a proposed permeable pavement system. 5.3. Type of Surface Pavement The type of pavement should be selected based on a review of the factors in Table 2, and designed according to the product manufacturer’s recommendations. 5.4. Internal Geometry and Drawdowns
5.5. Pretreatment Pretreatment for most permeable pavement applications is not necessary, since the surface acts as pretreatment to the reservoir layer below. Additional pretreatment may be desired if the pavement receives run-on from an adjacent pervious or impervious area. For example, a gravel filter strip can be used to trap coarse sediment particles before they reach the pavement surface to prevent premature clogging. 5.6. Conveyance and Overflow Permeable pavement designs should include methods to convey larger storms (i.e. 2-yr, 10-yr) to the storm drain system. The following methods that can be used to accommodate this:
5.7. Reservoir layer The thickness of the reservoir layer is determined by runoff storage needs, the infiltration rate of in situ soils, structural requirements of the pavement sub-base, depth to water table and bedrock, and frost depth conditions (see Section 6). A professional should be consulted regarding the suitability of the soil subgrade.
Underdrains The use of underdrains is recommended when there is a reasonable potential for infiltration rates to decrease over time, when underlying soils have an infiltration rates less than one half inch per hour, or when soils must be compacted to achieve desired Proctor density. Underdrains can also be used to manage extreme storm events to keep detained stormwater from backing up into the permeable pavement. Underdrains should be placed within the reservoir and encased in 8-12 inches of clean, washed stone. The underdrain outlets can be fitted with a flow-reduction orifice as a means of regulating the stormwater detention time. The minimum diameter of any orifice should be 0.5 inch. Underdrains can also be installed and capped at a downstream structure as an option for future use if maintenance observations indicate a reduction in the soil permeability. 5.9. Maintenance Reduction Features Maintenance is a crucial element to ensuring the long-term performance of permeable pavement. The most frequently cited maintenance problem is surface clogging caused by organic matter and sediment, which can be reduced by the following measures: Periodic Vacuum Sweeping.The pavement surface is the first line of defense in trapping sediment that may otherwise enter the base and soil subgrade. The rate of sediment deposition should be monitored and vacuum sweeping done once or twice a year, and adjusted according to the intensity of use and deposition rate on the permeable pavement. At least one sweeping pass should occur at the end of winter. Protecting the Bottom of the Reservoir Layer. There are two options to protect the bottom of the reservoir layer from intrusion by underlying soils. The first method involves covering the bottom with nonwoven, polypropylene geotextile that is permeable, although some practitioners recommend avoiding the use of filter fabric since it may become a future plane of clogging within the system. Permeable filter fabric is still recommended to protect the excavated sides of the reservoir layer to prevent soil piping. The second method is to form a barrier of choker stone and sand. In this case, underlying native soils should be separated from the reservoir base/subgrade layer by a thin, 2-4 inch layer of clean, washed, choker stone (ASTM D 448 No. 8 stone) below 6-8 inches of course sand. Observation Well. An observation well, consisting of a well-anchored, perforated 4-6 inch PVC pipe that extends vertically to the bottom of the reservoir layer, should be installed at the downstream end of all large scale permeable pavement systems. The observation well should be fitted with a lockable cap installed flush with the ground surface (or under the pavers) to facilitate periodic inspection and maintenance. The observation well is used to observe the rate of drawdown within the reservoir layer following a storm event. Overhead Landscaping.Most local communities require from 5 to 10 % landscaping around the parking lots, so large scale permeable paving applications should carefully plan on how to integrate this landscaping to maximize runoff treatment and minimize the chances that grass clippings, leaves, nuts, and fruits will inadvertently clog the paving surface. 5.10. Material Specifications Permeable pavement material specifications vary according to the specific pavement product selected. Table 5 describes general material specifications for the component structures installed beneath the permeable pavement. Please note that the size of stone materials used in the reservoir and filter layers may differ depending whether the system is PC, PA or IP (see Table 2). A general comparison of different permeable pavements is provided in Table 6, but designers should consult manufacture’s technical specifications for specific information.
SECTION 6: REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CASE DESIGN ADAPTATIONS The design adaptations described below permit permeable pavement to be used on a wider range of sites; however, it is important not to force this practice onto marginal sites. Other runoff reduction practices are often preferred alternatives for difficult sites. 6.1. Karst Terrain Active karst regions are found in much of the Ridge and Valley physiographic regions of Virginia, and complicate both development and stormwater design. A detailed geotechnical investigation may be required for any kind of stormwater design in karst terrain (see CSN Technical Bulletin No. 1; and the VA SWM Handbook) The use of Level 2 (i.e. infiltration) permeable pavement designs at sites with known karst features may cause the formation of sinkholes, especially for large scale pavement applications, and are not recommended. Designers should also avoid Level 2 permeable pavement design if the site is designated as a severe stormwater hotspot, or will discharge to areas known to provide groundwater recharge to aquifers used as a water supply.
Micro-scale and small scale permeable pavement are acceptable if they are designed to Level 1 (possess an impermeable bottom liner and an underdrain). The rock used in the reservoir layer should be carbonate in nature to provide extra buffering capacity.
Experience in North Carolina has shown that properly designed and installed permeable pavement systems can work effectively in the demanding conditions of the coastal plain. Designers should ensure that the distance from the bottom of the permeable pavement system to the top of the water table is at least 2 feet. If an underdrain is used beneath permeable pavement, a minimum 0.5% slope must be maintained to ensure proper drainage. 6.3. Piedmont/Clay Soils In areas where the underlying soils are not suitable for complete infiltration, permeable pavement systems with underdrains can still function effectively to reduce runoff and nutrients. If underlying soils have an infiltration rate of less than 0.5 in/hr, an underdrain must be installed to ensure proper drainage from the system. Permeable pavements should not be installed over underlying soils with high shrink/well potential. To promote greater runoff reduction for permeable pavement located on marginal soils, an elevated underdrain configuration can be used (section 7.3). 6.4. Winter Performance In winter conditions, freeze-thaw cycles may affect the structural durability of the permeable pavement system. In these situations, the following design adaptations may be helpful: To avoid damage caused by freezing, designs should not allow water to pond in or above the pervious pavement. Ensure complete drainage of the permeable pavement system within 24 hours of a rainfall event. Extend the filter bed and underdrain pipe below the frost line and/or oversize the underdrain by one pipe size to reduce the freezing potential. Large snow storage piles should be located in adjacent grassy areas so that sediments and pollutants in snowmelt are partially treated before they reach the permeable pavement. Sand should never be applied for winter traction, since it will quickly clog the system. When plowing plastic reinforced grid pavements, snow plow blades should be lifted ½ to 1 inch above the pavement surface to prevent damage to paving blocks or turf. Porous asphalt (PA), permeable concrete (PC) and interlocking pavers (IP) applications can be plowed similar to traditional pavements. Owners should be judicious when using chloride products for deicing over all permeable pavements designed for infiltration, since they have no capability to prevent salts from getting into groundwater. SECTION 7: PERMEABLE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND INSPECTION Experience has show that proper installation is absolutely critical to the effective operation of a permeable pavement system, 7.1. Construction Sequence Construction Stage ESC controls. All permeable pavement areas should be fully protected by silt fence or construction fencing, particularly if they are intended to infiltrate runoff. Permeable pavement areas should remain outside the limit of disturbance during construction to prevent soil compaction by heavy equipment. Permeable pavement areas should be clearly marked on all construction documents and grading plans. To prevent soil compaction, heavy vehicular and foot traffic should be kept out of permeable pavement areas during and immediately after construction. During construction, care should be taken to avoid tracking sediments onto the permeable pavement surface to avoid clogging. Permeable pavement areas should generally not be used for temporary sediment basins. Where unavoidable, the invert of the sediment basin shall be a minimum of two feet above the final design elevation of the bottom of the aggregate reservoir course. All sediment deposits in the excavated area should be carefully removed prior to installing the subbase, base and surface materials. 7.2. Permeable Pavement Installation The following is a typical construction sequence to properly install permeable pavement, which may need to be modified to depending on whether PA, PC or IP designs are employed. Step 1. Construction shall only begin after the entire contributing drainage area has been stabilized. The proposed site should be checked for existing utilities prior to any excavation. Do not install the system in rain or snow, and do not install frozen bedding materials. Step 2. Temporary erosion and sediment (E&S) controls are needed during installation to divert stormwater away from the permeable pavement area until it is completed. Special protection measures such as erosion control fabrics may be needed to protect vulnerable side slopes from erosion during the excavation process. The proposed permeable pavement area must be kept free from sediment during the entire job. Construction materials that are contaminated by sediments must be removed and replaced with clean materials. Step 3. Where possible, excavators or backhoes should work from the sides to excavate the reservoir layer to its appropriate design depth and dimensions. For micro and small-scale pavement applications, excavating equipment should have arms with adequate reach so they do not have to work inside the footprint of the permeable pavement area. Contractors can utilize a cell construction approach, whereby the proposed permeable pavement area is split into 500 to 1000 sf temporary cells with a 10-15 foot earth bridge in between, so that cells can be excavated from the side. Excavated material should be placed away from the open excavation so as to not jeopardize the stability of the side walls. Step 4. The native soils along the bottom and sides of the permeable pavement system should be scarified or tilled to a depth of 3-4 inches prior to the placement of the filter layer or filter fabric. In large scale paving applications with weak soils, the soil subgrade may need to compacted to 95% standard Proctor to achieved desired load bearing capacity (Note: this effectively eliminates the infiltration function of the installation, and must be addressed during hydrologic design. Step 5: Filter fabric should be installed on the bottom and the sides of the reservoir layer. In some cases, an alternative filter layer, as described in Section 7.6 may be warranted. Filter fabric strips should overlap down-slope by a minimum of two feet, and be secured a minimum of four feet beyond the edge of the excavation. Where the filter layer extends beyond the edge of the pavement (to convey runoff to the reservoir layer), install an additional layer of filter fabric one foot below the surface to prevent sediments from entering into the reservoir layer. Excess filter fabric should not be trimmed until the site is fully stabilized. Step 6. Provide a minimum of two inches of aggregate above and below the pipe. The underdrains should slope down towards the outlet at a grade of 0.5 percent or steeper. The up-gradient end of underdrains in the reservoir layer should be capped. Underdrain pipe connected to structures shall be non-perforated within one foot of the structure. Ensure that clean-outs and observation wells are non-perforated within one foot of the surface. Step 7. Moisten and spread 6 inch lifts of the appropriate clean, washed stone aggregate (usually No. 2 or 57 stone). Place additional aggregate to at least four inches above the underdrain, and then compact using a vibratory roller in static mode until there is no visible movement of the aggregate. Do not crush the aggregate with the roller. Step 8. Install the desired depth of the bedding layer, depending on the type of pavement as follows: PC: No bedding layer used. PA: The bedding layer for pervious asphalt pavement shall consist of one to two inches of clean, washed ASTM D 448 No.57 stone. The filter course shall be leveled and pressed (choked) into the reservoir base with at least four passes of a ten ton steel drum static roller. IP: The bedding layer for open-jointed pavement blocks should consist of one and a half to two inches of washed ASTM D 448 No.8 stone. The thickness of the bedding layer is to be based on the block manufacturer’s recommendation or that of a qualified professional. Step 9. The installation sequence depends on the type of pavement, and should be done in accordance with manufacturer or industry specifications. 9a Installation of Pervious Asphalt (PA). The following has been excerpted from various documents, most notably Jackson (2007). Install porous asphalt pavement similarly to regular asphalt pavement. The pavement should be laid in a single lift over the filter course. The laying temperature should be between 230oF and 260oF, with a minimum air temperature of 50oF, to ensure that the surface does not stiffen before compaction. Complete compaction of the surface course when the surface is cool enough to resist a ten ton roller. One or two passes of the roller are required for proper compaction. More rolling could cause a reduction in the porosity of the pavement. The mixing plant shall provide certification of the aggregate mix, abrasion loss factor, and asphalt content in the mix. Test the asphalt mix for its resistance to stripping by water using ASTM 1664. If the estimated coating area is not above 95 percent, additional anti-stripping agents shall be added to the mix. Transport the mix to the site in a clean vehicle with smooth dump beds sprayed with a non-petroleum release agent. The mix shall be covered during transportation to control cooling. Test the full permeability of the pavement surface by application of clean water at a rate of at least five gallons per minute over the surface. All water must infiltrate directly, without puddle formation or surface runoff. Inspect the facility 18 to 30 hours after a significant rainfall (greater than one-half inch) or artificial flooding, to determine that the facility is draining properly. 9b Installation of Pervious Concrete (PC). The basic installation sequence for pervious concrete is outlined in American Concrete Institute (2008). It is strongly recommended that concrete installers successfully complete a recognized pervious concrete installers training program, such as the Pervious Concrete Contractor Certification Program offered by NRMCA. The basic procedure is as follows: Drive the concrete truck as close to the project site as possible. Water the underlying aggregate (reservoir layer) before the concrete is placed so that the aggregate does not draw moisture from the freshly laid pervious concrete. After the concrete is placed, approximately 0.375 to 0.5 inch is struck off, using a vibratory screed. This is to allow for compaction of the concrete pavement. Compact the pavement with a steel pipe roller. Care should be taken so that over compaction does not occur. Cut joints for the concrete to a depth of 0.25 inch. The curing process is very important for pervious concrete. Cover the pavement with plastic sheeting within 20 minutes of the strike-off and keep covered for at least seven days. No traffic can be allowed on the pavement during this time. 9c Installation of Interlocking Pavers (IP). The basic installation process is described in greater detail by Smith (2006). Place edge restraints for open-jointed pavement blocks before the bedding layer and pavement blocks are installed. Place the No. 57 stone in a single lift. Level the filter course and compact into the reservoir course beneath with at least four passes of a ten ton steel drum static roller until there is no visible movement. The first two passes are in vibratory mode with the final two in static mode. The filter aggregate should be moist to facilitate movement into the reservoir course. Place and screed the bedding course material (typically No. 8 stone). Fill gaps at the edge of the paved areas with cut pavers or edge units. When required, cut pavers with a paver splitter or masonry saw. Cut pavers no smaller than one-third of the full unit size. Pavers may be placed by hand or with mechanical installers. Fill the joints and openings with stone. Joint openings shall be filled with VDOT No. 8 stone, although VDOT No. 8P or No. 9 stone may be used where needed to fill narrow joints. Remove excess stones from the paver surface. Compact and seat pavers into the bedding course with a minimum low-amplitude 5,000-lbf, 75- to 95-Hz plate compactor. Do not compact within six feet of the unrestrained edges of the pavers. The system must be thoroughly swept by a mechanical sweeper or vacuumed to remove any sediment or excess aggregate immediately after construction. Inspect the area for settlement. Any blocks that settle shall be reset and re-inspected. Inspect the facility 18 to 30 hours after a significant rainfall (0.5 inch or greater) or artificial flooding to determine whether the facility is draining properly. Permeable interlocking concrete pavement (IP) systems require edge restraints to prevent vehicle loads from moving the paver blocks. Edge restraints may be standard VDOT curbs or gutter pans, or precast or cast in place reinforced concrete borders a minimum of six inches wide and 18 inches deep, constructed with Class A3 concrete. Edge restraints along the traffic side of a permeable pavement block system are recommended. 7.3. Construction Inspection Inspections before, during and after construction are needed to ensure that permeable pavement is built in accordance with these specifications. Use detailed inspection checklists that require sign-offs by qualified individuals at critical stages of construction, to ensure that the contractor’s interpretation of the plan is consistent with the designer’s intent. Some common pitfalls can be avoided by careful construction supervision that focuses on the following key aspects of permeable pavement installation: Store materials in protected area to keep them free from mud, dirt, and other foreign materials. The contributing drainage area should be stabilized prior to directing water to the permeable pavement area. Check aggregate material to confirm that it is clean and washed, meets specifications and is installed to the correct depth. Check elevations such as the invert of the underdrain, inverts for inflow and outflow points, and the surface slope. Make sure the permeable pavement surface is even, runoff evenly spreads across it, and the storage bed drains within 48 hours. Ensure that caps are placed on the upstream (but not the downstream) end of the underdrain. Inspect the pretreatment structures (if applicable) to make sure they are properly installed and working effectively. Once the final construction inspection has been completed, log the GPS coordinates for each facility to enter into the local BMP maintenance tracking database. It may be advisable to divert the runoff from the first few runoff-producing storms away from larger permeable pavement applications, particularly when up-gradient conventional asphalt areas drain to the permeable pavement. This can help reduce the input of fine particles that are often produced shortly after conventional asphalt is laid down. SECTION 8. PERMEABLE PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 8.1. Maintenance Agreements Section 4VAC 50-60-124 of the regulations specifies a maintenance agreement to be executed between the owner and the local program. The section requires a schedule of inspections, compliance procedures if maintenance is neglected, notification of the local program upon transfer of ownership, and right-of-entry for local program personnel. When micro or small-scale permeable pavement are installed on private residential lots, homeowners will need to be educated on their routine maintenance needs, understand the long-term maintenance plan, and be subject to a deed restriction or other mechanism enforceable by the qualifying local program to help ensure that the pervious paver system are maintained and functioning. The mechanism should, if possible, grant authority for local agencies to access the property for inspection or corrective action. 8.2. Maintenance Tasks It is difficult to prescribe the specific types or frequency of maintenance tasks that are needed to maintain the hydrologic function of permeable pavement systems over time. Most installations work reasonably well year after year with little or no maintenance, whereas some have problems right from the start. The one preventative maintenance task for large-scale applications may involve vacuum sweeping on a frequency consistent with the use and loadings encountered in the parking lot. Many consider an annual, dry weather sweeping in the spring months to be important. The contract for sweeping should specify that a vacuum sweeper be used that does not use water spray, since these may lead to subsurface clogging. Vacuum settings for large-scale IP applications should be calibrated so they do pick up the stones between pavement blocks. 8.3. Maintenance Inspections It is highly recommended that a spring maintenance inspection and cleanup be conducted at each permeable pavement site, particularly at large-scale applications. Maintenance of permeable pavement is driven by annual inspections that evaluate the condition and performance of the practice (see Table 7). Based on inspection results, specific maintenance tasks will be triggered. Based on the inspection results, a series of maintenance tasks are scheduled to keep the facility in operating condition.
SECTION 9: COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. Porous concrete (PC) and porous asphalt (PA) are generally considered to be ADA compliant. Most localities also consider interlocking concrete pavers (IP) to be complaint if designers ensure that surface openings between pavers do not exceed ½ inch. Some forms of IP, however, may not be suitable for handicapped parking spaces. However, IP interspersed with other hardscape features (e.g., concrete walkways) can be used in creative designs to address ADA issues. Groundwater Protection. While well-drained soils enhance the ability of permeable pavement to reduce stormwater runoff volumes, they may also increase the risk that stormwater pollutants might migrate into groundwater aquifers. Designers should avoid the use of infiltration-based permeable pavement in areas known to provide groundwater recharge to aquifers used for water supply. In these source water protection areas, designers should include liners and underdrains in large scale permeable pavement applications (i.e., when the proposed surface area exceeds 10,000 square feet). Stormwater Hotspots. Designers should also certify that the proposed permeable pavement area will not accept any runoff from a severe stormwater hotspot. Stormwater hotspots are operations or activities that are known to produce higher concentrations of stormwater pollutants and/or have a greater risk for spills, leaks or illicit discharges. Examples include certain industrial activities, gas stations, public works area, petroleum storage areas (for a complete list of hotspots where infiltration is restricted or prohibited see Design Specification No. 8, Infiltration). For potential hotspots, restricted infiltration means that a minimum of 50% of the total Tv must be treated by a filtering or bioretention practice prior to the permeable pavement system. For known severe hotspots, the risk of groundwater contamination from spills, leaks or discharges is so great that infiltration of stormwater or snowmelt through permeable pavement is prohibited. Underground Injection Control Permits.The Safe Drinking Water Act regulates the infiltration of stormwater in certain situations under the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program, which is administered either by the EPA or a delegated state groundwater protection agency. In general, EPA (2008) have determined that permeable pavement installations are not classified as Class V injection wells, since they are always wider than they are deep. There may be an exception in karst terrain if the discharge from permeable pavement is directed to an improved sinkhole, although this would be uncommon. More guidance on stormwater design in karst terrain can be found in CSN (2009). Winter Time Operation.Experience has shown permeable pavement can operate properly in snow and ice conditions, and there is evidence that a permeable surface increases meltwater rates compared to conventional pavement (thereby reducing the need for deicing chemicals). In larger parking lot applications, however, certain snow management practices need to be modified to maintain their hydrologic function. These include not applying sand for traction and educating snowplow operators to keep blades from damaging the pavement surface. The jointing material for IP systems (typically No. 8 stone) can be spread over surface ice to increase tire traction Air and Runoff Temperature.Permeable pavement appears to have some value in reducing summer runoff temperatures, which can be important in watersheds with sensitive cold-water fish populations. The temperature reduction effect is greatest when runoff is infiltrated into the sub-base, but some cooling may also occur in the reservoir layer, when underdrains are used. ICPI (2008) notes that the use of certain colors for interlocking concrete pavers (IP) can help moderate surface parking lot temperatures. Vehicle Safety. Permeable pavement is generally considered to be a safer surface than conventional pavement according to research reported by Smith (2006), Jackson (2007) and ACI (2008). Permeable pavement has less risk of hydroplaning, more rapid ice melt and better traction than conventional pavement. SECTION 10: DESIGN REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2003. Standard Classification for Sizes of Aggregate for Road and Bridge Construction. ASTM D448-03a. West Conshohocken, Pa. Chesapeake Stormwater Network (CSN). 2009. Technical Bulletin No. 1. Stormwater Design Guidelines for Karst Terrain in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Version 2.0. Baltimore, MD. www.chesapeakestormwater.net Hathaway, J. and W. Hunt. 2007. Stormwater BMP Costs. Report to NC DEHNR. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering. North Carolina State University Hirschman, D., L. Woodworth and S. Drescher. 2009. Technical Report: Stormwater BMPs in Virginia’s James River Basin: An Assessment of Field Conditions & Programs. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD. Hunt, W. and K. Collins. 2008. Permeable Pavement: Research Update and Design Implications”. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin. Urban Waterways Series. AG-588-14. North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC. Available Online: http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/PublicationFiles/ PermPave2008.pdf. Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI). 2008. Permeable interlocking concrete pavement: a coamprison guide to porous asphalt and pervious concrete. Jackson, N. 2007. Design, construction and maintenance guide for porous asphalt pavements. National Asphalt Pavement Association. Information Series 131. Lanham, MD www.hotmix.com Northern Virginia Regional Association (NVRA). 2007. Low Impact Development Supplement to the Northern Virginia BMP Handbook. Fairfax, Virginia Schueler et al 2007. Urban Stormwater Retrofit Practices. Manual 3 in the Urban Subwatershed Restoration Manual Series. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD. Schueler, T. 2008. Technical Support for the Baywide Runoff Reduction Method. Chesapeake Stormwater Network. Baltimore, MD www.chesapeakestormwater.net Schueler, T., C. Swann, T. Wright and S. Sprinkle. 2004. Pollution source control practices. Manual No. 8 in the Urban Subwatershed Restoration Manual Series. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD. Smith, D. 2006. Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement-selection design, construction and maintenance. Third Edition. Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute. Herndon, VA. U.S EPA. 2008. June 13 2008 Memo. L. Boornaizian and S. Heare. Clarification on which stormwater infiltration practices/technologies have the potential to be regulated as “Class V” wells by the Underground Injection Control Program. Water Permits Division and Drinking Water Protection Division. Washington, D.C. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 2003. Guidelines for 1993 AASHTO Pavement Design. Virginia Department of Transportation, Materials Division. Pavement Design and Evaluation Section. Available: WERF. 2005. Performance and Whole-life Costs of Best Management Practices and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems. Water Environment Research Federation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||